Evidence over opinion.
A treatment plan is grounded in a documented diagnosis, imaging of record, and a written rationale shared with the patient before consent.
We admit on evidence, publish on rigour, and discipline on record. Membership is not bought. It is earned, examined, and renewed each year against a public standard.
The association exists because a title is not a guarantee. We hold our members to a public standard, document what they do, and make that record findable — so that a person seeking implant care can choose with their eyes open.
Most professional bodies are membership clubs that publish a code of ethics. We are membership-by-examination, with rulings that name names. Six concrete differences.
A practitioner cannot pay their way in. Two written examinations, an oral defence before three Fellows drawn by lot, twelve case files reviewed independently — these things take eight months on average, and they fail 59% of candidates on first attempt.
Every member files a case log each January. Roughly 4% of cases are drawn by lot and audited by two Fellows from outside the member's country. The summary is filed in the public record. There is no opting out.
Disciplinary outcomes carry the operator's name, the date of the complaint, the breaches by Article number, and the sanction. The patient is not named. We have lost no defamation suit since founding.
No sponsorship of the congress, the journal, the website, or the registry. Income comes from dues, congress fees, and journal subscriptions only. The accounts are filed publicly each quarter; donations are named.
There is no honorary class, no founder's seat, no complimentary admission for senior figures. The founding Council voted against it in 2007 ten to one. The vote has been retested twice and stands.
A patient complaint is acknowledged the day it is received, investigated within sixty days, ruled within ninety. Ninety days is a deadline, not a target. The Council has missed it twice since 2007; both incidents are on the record.
Eight disciplinary rulings in the most recent six months. Names, dates, breaches, and sanctions are public. Read any of them in Acta Implantologica.
Substituted operator without re-consent on three documented cases. Substantiated.
Late disclosure filing; incomplete audit submission. Substantiated.
Treatment plan undertaken without written rationale; complaint upheld in part.
Failed to respond to formal complaint within statutory window; complaint heard on default.
Every tier is earned and re-earned. There is no honorary fellowship for sale, no founder's loophole, no complimentary entry. Failure to renew on the standard removes the member from the registry.
The senior class. Awarded after ten years of clean record, a published case series, and a passed peer review.
The working class of the association. Open to qualified practitioners who pass examination and submit an annual case log.
For early-career practitioners working toward the Member exam. Mentored, observed, and expected to progress.
For residents and dental students with an intent to practise implantology. Free of dues; limited to learning.
Every member, in every class, signs the same six articles each year. They are not advisory. A breach is brought before the Standards Council; rulings are published in the Journal, without anonymisation.
A treatment plan is grounded in a documented diagnosis, imaging of record, and a written rationale shared with the patient before consent.
Industry payments, equity, paid speaking, and supplier arrangements are disclosed annually. The register is public, searchable, dated.
The surgeon of record is the human who performs the surgery. No ghost operators, no outsourced execution, no last-minute substitutions without written notice.
Every member submits an annual case log. A random sample is audited by two Fellows drawn by lot. The audit summary is part of the public file.
Patient complaints are accepted, investigated, and ruled on within ninety days. Outcomes are published — not buried in correspondence.
A member declines what is beyond their competence and names a colleague who can perform it. Greed is not a clinical indication.
The registry is the public face of the association. Every listing is current, audited, and signed off by the member themselves. Removals are dated and reasoned.
Acta Implantologica is the quarterly of the association — peer-reviewed, no industry advertising, no pay-to-publish. Every published study is required to release de-identified data.
Members owe forty hours of recorded education each year, twelve of which must be earned in person. The schedule is open to the profession; only members are obliged to attend.
Three days of reviewed failure cases, presented by the operator of record. No keynote sponsorships, no industry track.
Oral defence of submitted case series, before a panel of three Fellows drawn by lot. Pass rate, posted publicly each year.
Open hearing of two outstanding complaints. Members may observe; the press is admitted by application. Rulings issued within thirty days.
Residents and senior students sit with audited Fellows over live cases. Open enrolment; mentored placements offered.
The Council serves three-year terms, elected by the Fellows. Council minutes are signed, dated, and published the week after each sitting — without redaction beyond patient privacy.
Madrid. Twenty-one years in practice. Chair of the Standards Council 2019–2023.
Geneva. Editor-in-chief, Acta Implantologica 2021–. Multicentre research lead.
Edinburgh. Twelve years on Standards. Author of the Vance Protocol on consent.
Kyoto. Oversees the registry, the annual audit drawing, and member file integrity.
Each issue of Acta Implantologica highlights one member's file. The current feature: Dr. Jose Manuel Jimenez, F.I.A. — Fellow since 2014.
D.D.S. — Dental Implant Specialist · Los Algodones, Mexico
Harvard-trained dental implant specialist with twenty-five years in practice and over five thousand patients restored. Clinical focus: All-on-5 titanium-bar, full-arch implants, zirconia, bone grafting, and the complex reconstructions other clinics turn away.
The first professional body that publishes its own disciplinary rulings without anonymising them — and survives doing so.
There is no shortcut, no fast track, no acquaintance class. If you can stand the examination and the annual audit, the association is built for practitioners like you. If you cannot, it is not.